ANA Marketing Maestros

Listen. Engage. Respond.

By Guest Blogger Lisa Neary

According to Arianna Huffington, a part of the Huffington Post's success has been based on that simple strategy: Listen. Engage. Respond. It's no secret that the general sentiment towards Corporate America is at an all-time low. Couple consumer doubt with the economic hardships that the majority of Americans are facing and marketers are now faced with using their conversations in social media to help public relations initiatives to foster trust and loyalty to the brand, product or company.

For The Huffington Post part of building this trust has been through creating content around topics that the readership cares about. How do they know what their readers want? They listen and ask then they act. Arianna reminded us that, self-expression has become the new form of entertainment and they foster this dialogue to further nurture reader relations. Leveraging these insights has enabled The Huffington Post to cultivate a participatory and loyal readership. Here are four other ways they continue to differentiate:

a.     Watch the trends. With a small internal staff, THP leverages a vast pool of talent who contribute to the internet newspaper through blog posts.

b.     Get a cause. Create a pulse, a personality, a value system for your brand. Customers want a connection to your brand that resonates with them.

c.     Accept failure. Or run the risk of becoming stale. The biggest risks come with the biggest rewards. Experiment.

d.     Be nimble. Operate as flat as possible and encourage input from all levels of the organization.

While these ideas may not be new, they are the tenets to developing a successful presence in the social media presence where your audience is savvy, is easily distracted and demands a more personal relationship. As Arianna explains, "Time is long. Life is short." Slow down, start having some meaningful conversations with your audience, and be sure to take notes. 

The FTC Gives Tweens an “Ad-ucation”

By Cara Brooke Schultz

Can a video game be used as an educational tool? The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would like to think so. They recently developed a new campaign—an educational video game—to educate kids about marketing and advertising. The FTC launched this campaign for three main reasons: to raise awareness of advertising messages among children ages 8 to 12; teach critical thinking skills that will allow tweens to analyze and interpret advertisements; and demonstrate the benefits of being an informed consumer.  

 

The FTC is hoping that not only will this video game help “ad-ucate” young consumers, but that it will help to enhance critical thinking skills.  The campaign’s website gives teachers educational tools to help raise advertising awareness among students. For example, teachers can download a lesson that invites students to explore what advertising is, what ads do, and who’s responsible for the messages being projected in the ads.  

The video game isn’t the most graphically enhanced, and with all the video-entertainment out there for tweens, I’m not sure how this will effectively hold their attention (although I’m sure they will find this video game more enjoyable then any old lesson plan).  However, I think it’s a great concept, tweens should understand advertising and anything that helps to generate critical thinking skills is a plus! Test out your ad-skills at admongo.

Procure This!

By Bill Duggan

ANA’s Advertising Financial Management runs Sunday-Wednesday in Florida. For the first time ever, this annual event is sold out. 400+ people will be in attendance and many of these attendees will be client procurement/sourcing people.

One of the conference sessions is entitled, “Procurement: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly” and will debut results of a survey among (a) client procurement; (b) client marketing; and (c) agencies on the state of marketing procurement.  We can’t reveal the juicy stuff until the conference, but in the meantime, here are the survey findings that cover information such as the background/level of experience of procurement professionals and reporting structure.

• Marketing procurement has been in existence, on average, for 10 years. 
• Meanwhile, a marketing procurement professional has an average of 7 years in marketing procurement and 12 years total experience as procurement professional.

A common critique is that many procurement professionals lack proper marketing training—but the numbers above show that marketing procurement is still in its infancy (at many companies) and the fact that there is 7 years average experience in marketing procurement versus 10 years average existence for the department is impressive.

The backgrounds of marketing procurement people are pretty equally divided:

• 43% were previously in another procurement role, non-marketing
• 38% were previously in a marketing or agency role

A debate we’ve heard – “Is it better to have a procurement person go into marketing procurement or a marketing person go into procurement?"  There is no clear answer but it’s an interesting debate. 

Finally, here’s where procurement reports: (percentages add to greater than 100% due to multiple reporting structures):
    Supply Chain Management or Strategic Sourcing: 38%
    Finance or Accounting: 30%
    Stand-Alone Purchasing or Procurement Group: 20%
    Advertising, Marketing and/or Marketing Communications: 12%
    Operations: 8%
    Corporate Services: 7%
    Other Groups: 3%

Stay tuned as there’s more to come!

Your Tweets Have a New Home...Welcome to The Library of Congress

By Cara Brooke Schultz

Did you think the tweet you wrote publicly pronouncing your love for a new product would stay in “twitterspace” forever? The idea that tweets would slowly dissolve into Internet space is no longer! Twitter and the Library of Congress announced that every public tweet posted since the birth of Twitter in 2006 will be digitally archived.

According to the Library of Congress’ Web site, “The Twitter digital archive has extraordinary potential for research into our contemporary way of life. This information provides detailed evidence about how technology based social networks form and evolve over time. The collection also documents a remarkable range of social trends,” said Librarian of Congress James H. Billington.

 

Only public tweets will be archived, and even Google is getting in on the action. Google is planning on creating an interactive archive. People can search tweets at any point in time and ‘replay’ what people were tweeting about at that very moment! Think historical moments like Barack Obama’s inauguration or the devastating earthquake in Haiti.

Would you use the Twitter archive? If so, what chatter would you like to look-up?

 

From Thanksgiving Turkey to Springtime Favorite

By Duke Fanelli

I maybe a bit late to the party, but I was thinking about Tiger Woods and the hype surrounding his decision to play at the Masters Tournament. I have to admit, for all intents and purpose he played masterly…yeah some bad shots and he was highly critical of his own play, but he finished Sunday tied for fourth (-11 under par). Not bad after being out of commission for more than five months, dealing with personal and family issues.

Most striking throughout the four-day Tigerfest, was the media and gallery’s acceptance of Tiger. If you had spent the past five months living in a cave, you’d never have known how nasty things got. The #1 player in the world was back and he and his fans were basking in the glow. (Not to take anything away from Phil Mickelson’s win, which was spectacular, well deserved and a milestone in his career.) The Sports, marketing and armchair pundits, who earlier this year wanted to see Tiger’s head impaled on a fairway wood, were nowhere to be seen. Except for an errant Tiger-detractor, who paid to have a small plane fly over Augusta National—with a not so obvious reference to Tiger’s apology speech—the crowd loved watching his come back.

So where does this all leave us? American’s have notoriously short memories when it comes to celebrity misdeeds and we are certainly as forgiving when it comes to the idiotic behavior of our star athletes. So the question is: will Tiger get some of his old endorsements back? I’m guessing the answer is no. But a more intriguing question may be are new endorsements right around the corner? And, who is first in line?  Anyone want to weigh in with a guess?

By the way, Tiger’s comeback at the Masters gave ESPN the highest U.S. audience ever for a golf event on cable TV, as nearly 5 million people tuned in to watch Thursday’s first round. As the millions viewing the Master’s can attest, Tiger’s back, his fan base is strong and shooting 11 under par last week, is a clear indication that he is capable (which some doubted) of topping the list of golf’s superstars for some time to come. Is this a Rod Tidwell and Jerry McGuire moment?

New Plans for Local Ratings Unfair to Advertisers

By Bill Duggan

Nielsen, last week, formally announced its plans to eliminate the reporting of live-only local TV ratings to advertisers and its local station clients. Now, advertisers and local stations will only have overnight access to data for three different data streams: live program plus same day time-shifting of programming, live plus three day time-shifting, and live plus seven day time-shifting. Going forward, live-only data will only be available in custom reports, on a delayed basis.

Advertisers and agencies are disappointed. Nielsen has made it clear since this issue arose in 2009 that it could make three data streams available. Advertisers and agencies have been consistently adamant regarding the need for the live-only stream and have been willing to concede to the local stations the choice for the other two streams.  But now all available streams for local TV ratings will be “plus” and therefore include time-shifting.

On the national level, the evolution from program ratings to average commercial ratings has been a positive step and C3 takes into consideration three day time-shifting. But it is important to point out that on the local level program ratings continue to be used. Therefore, all the “plus” streams do not take into consideration commercial skipping in DVR playback. As a result, local commercial viewing would clearly be overstated—some agencies estimate that this change will result in an instant 7 percent viewership boost to local TV stations. Overstated rating could then lead to overstated ad rates.

 

This situation is unfair and unfortunate. Again, there are three local ratings streams available. One of those streams should be live-only as the majority of agencies and advertisers have consistently told Nielsen as well as the local stations. Remember, it’s those advertising dollars that ultimately fund the local stations and well as Nielsen’s ratings services. Why has the opinion of advertisers and agencies been disregarded?

And The Winner Is....Social Media!

By Cara Brooke Schultz

Who will be watching the Oscars on Sunday night? Okay…you can put your hand down now, and continue reading.

I’ll be watching the Oscars for two main reasons:

1. To see what all the actresses will be wearing—so I can then pour over the images on the Internet Monday morning and discuss the magnificent fashion hits as well as the misfortunate tragedies. 
2. To find out what movie will win best picture, which actor will win best actor, and which actress will win best actress.

So technically you could consider that four reasons, but for the purpose of this Blog post we’ll continue to count that as two. After the Oscars, when I discuss the fashion statements with my friends, am I going to be calling them to chat? No way! Who has time for that?! 
 
Instead, I’ll be online via Blogs, Web sites, forums, and of course social media—and advertisers are very much aware of this. For example, a USA Today, article talked about how several Oscar advertisers are making a push in their social media efforts this year, “’It's no longer smart just to buy on the Academy Awards,’ says consultant Charlene Li. ‘You have to tie into social media so that people talk about you.”’

According to the article, we can expect to see a social media push from the following companies: J.C. Penney, Samsung, Hyundai, and Cottonelle, just to name a few. If you plan on watching the Oscars, where will your water-cooler conversations be taking place?

The Path to Brand-Specific Commercial Ratings

By Bill Duggan

Nielsen recently announced that this past Super Bowl (XLIV) was the most watched television show of all time with 106.5 million average viewers.  Also, Nielsen provided a special report on the viewership of individual Super Bowl commercials.

Of course, ratings for individual national commercials are not yet available.  The current C3 metric that Nielsen provides for national ratings refers to the ratings for average commercial minutes in live programming plus three days of digital video recorder playback.

ANA and Nielsen have been collaborating on an initiative to increase the granularity of ratings that could indeed lead to individual commercial ratings.  Advertisers deserve such granularity to answer the question, "How many people actually had the opportunity to see my spot?"  

The just-released white paper, “The Path to Brand-Specific Commercial Ratings,” has details of the work Nielsen and ANA have done.

By the way, a Doritos commercial featuring two men in a gym being attacked for stealing someone else’s Doritos was the most watched commercial of Super Bowl XLIV (and also the most watched commercial of all time!) with an estimated 116.2 million viewers. 

Nielsen’s full rundown of the most watched commercials of Super Bowl XLIV is here.

Opportunities & Key Threats for TV and Video

By Bill Duggan

For the fifth time since 2002 ANA has partnered with Forrester Research on survey work to better understand advertiser perceptions and use, both now and expected in future, on television and video.  Forrester has summarized the key research findings and provided their perspective on the results in their report titled TV Advertising Budgets Are Under Siege. Meanwhile, the following provides a topline from ANA’s point-of-view.

Overall:
The death of television has been greatly exaggerated. While it’s true that television budgets have been reduced (per the title of the Forrester report), those reductions are more a reflection of broader economic conditions impacting all media. The reductions in television spending have, in fact, been less severe than most other media. 

From the broadest perspective, when asked to “comment on the value of TV advertising for the specific needs of your company” representative responses were:
• Pro: “Television is essential for building broad reach and brand awareness.”
• Con: “Television’s effectiveness/value is diminishing.”

The ANA/Forrester survey helps point to many opportunities, as well as some key threats, for television and video.

Opportunities:
• Branded entertainment: Eighty percent of advertisers agree that branded entertainment will play much more of a role in television advertising. Thirty-eight percent plan to spend more on branded entertainment in 2010 as an alternative to the traditional 30-second TV spot.
• Addressable television: Seventy-eight percent of advertisers are interested in the ability to target consumers more precisely—by demographics, zip code, or purchase behavior. However, advertisers don’t expect to pay much of a premium for such targeting.
• Interactive television: Seventy-five percent believe that interactive television will be an effective source of lead generation, but only 28% plan to spend more on interactive ads in 2010 as an alternative to the 30-second TV spot. Advertisers may want to see the interactive television advertising landscape further develop before they increase spending.
• Brand-specific commercial ratings: An overwhelming 82% are interested in having ratings for individual commercials (also called brand-specific commercial ratings) available for analysis.  
• Online video ads: Forty-six percent of advertisers plan to spend more on ads in online video/online television shows in 2010 as alternatives to the traditional 30-second TV spot.
• Place-based video: Sixty-four percent agree that place-based video in stores, elevators, and other locations will become increasingly important.

Threats:
• Overall effectiveness: Advertisers believe that television advertising is not as effective as it used to be. Sixty-two percent of respondents think television advertising has become less effective in the past two years.
• Clutter: Sixty-nine percent of advertisers would like fewer commercials in a pod in order to gain visibility.
• DVRs and video-on-demand: Sixty-six percent think that DVRs and video-on-demand will reduce (61%) or destroy (5%) the effectiveness of the 30-second television commercial.
• Shifts to other media: Advertisers plan to spend more on various forms of non-television media including social media (77%), web advertising (73%), search (59%), email (46%), and mobile (46%).

ANA members can download the complete report at www.ana.net/thoughtleadership.

Are You Relevant?

By Adrienne Tallacksen

More marketers are turning to social media as a way to reach consumers, as shown in the recent ANA study “Harnessing the Power of Newer Media Platforms”. In 2007, 20% of survey respondents were using social media. The 2009 survey found that 66% now use social media platforms. Just over half of marketers surveyed are funding newer media spending with dollars shifted from traditional media.

When moving into the newer media space, marketers must continue to remain relevant to consumers. In a presentation at the June Central Region Digital Marketing Meeting, Google’s Jim Lecinski spoke about staying relevant in a presentation titled “Connecting with the Recession Shopper.” Lecinski said marketers must be useful, helpful, and relevant; not interruptive, shocking, or annoying.

If I’m looking for tomorrow’s weather forecast, I am definitely not interested in a candy ad taking up half of my screen. I’m trying to think of a situation where this ad might be relevant, and I’m coming up with nothing. However, an ad for shipping services on a social networking site for business professionals could be useful. I might not have an immediate need to ship something, but the ad is at least in the ballpark of relevancy.