By Barbara Bacci Mirque
One of the paradoxes that marketers are currently grappling with is that in many circumstances the production costs of digital media exceeds that of the media costs. And since production is something for which agencies need to be compensated, digital agency compensation costs are rising. What I have heard some senior marketers say is that their bosses don’t understand this situation since digital media was initially touted as being more efficient than traditional media. Some of this can be attributed to inefficient processes that currently exist in the digital media ecosystem which the IAB and AAAA, with support of the ANA, are working on. To help our members benchmark digital agency compensation, the ANA recently fielded a survey on this topic. Mary Conrad of Jones, Lundin, Beals was nice enough to be our subject matter expert and interpret the survey findings. The initial results reflect this contradiction. Phoenix
The good news is that digital budgets are increasing despite economic stress. But along with that, the number of digital agencies being utilized is also increasing as services proliferate. The bad news for marketers is that the expanding roster of digital agencies means more complex agency management issues and higher agency compensation fees. The bottom line is that on a percentage basis digital agencies command a higher percentage of the marketing budget than traditional agencies. As we obtain more survey respondents, we will be delving into and releasing these findings in the coming months. A preliminary report will be issued at the ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference beginning Sunday April 19 in
If you are a client side marketer and would like to take the survey, contact Lindsey Raczka at [email protected].
Recent Comments