Posted by Association of National Advertisers on November 18, 2009 in Advertising, Marketing, Marketing Accountability | Permalink | Comments (0)
Marketers will always have an affinity for print
advertising. It’s one of our most valuable targeting and reach-extending
media. It has shelf life, and it’s extraordinary in its ability to match the
advertising message with the editorial content.
10. Get with the digital program! Print media
should be the leaders – not the followers – in this exciting realm. There is an
expanding bundle of opportunities that will open up new vistas for everyone in
the communications business – particularly those in the print arena. Do it now
and make the world safe for the world of opportunity.
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on June 24, 2005 in Advertising, Conferences, Marketing, Marketing Accountability | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Of course the journey is very long – but the principle of
marketing accountability seems to be finally getting a grip on the overall
Marketing Supply Chain. And I am thrilled!
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on May 24, 2005 in Advertising, Conferences, Marketing, Marketing Accountability, Television | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
So what are the common denominators for successful
marketers in today’s rapidly changing environment? How can leaders best respond to the
challenges of putting consumers in charge … and for making marketing investments
more accountable?
The pathway to each of these six platforms is through
technology, innovation and experimentation. And importantly, they all recognize
that marketing has dramatically shifted -- from a focus on the masses, to a
focus on the individual. Marketing will
continue to evolve -- ultimately, I believe, becoming a true “One-to-One” discipline. Consumers have enormous leverage and power to
determine what they want to see and hear. We marketers must determine how we’re going to get invited to the table
because in essence, marketing is becoming “By invitation only.”
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on April 14, 2005 in Advertising, Food and Drink, Marketing, Marketing Accountability, Television | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (2)
In my last blog posting, “Who’s Killing Television”, I
focused most of my remarks on key issues that the Television industry needs to
address in short order. At ANA’s Television Advertising Forum yesterday, I
reiterated those concerns – and, in fact, added one or two more.
* Second, convergence will be channeled through one of the most important future tools for marketers – the set-top box. This virtual in-home computer will become the advertisers’ best friend and will be the foundation for lots of positive change for television advertising. In particular, the data that cable and satellite companies will be able to provide to advertisers will – for the first time -- deliver important measurements and metrics and facilitate the level of accountability so needed by the marketing community.
* Third, television advertising inventory will continue
to expand with the proliferation of channels and programming. With more
channels and, theoretically, more content to fill those channels, the laws of
supply and demand just may tip the scales back in the direction of marketers. Advertisers
will be able to use television more selectively, hopefully moderating the
growth of CPMs and bringing them in line with more reasonable measures.
The television industry has some of the smartest and
savviest people in the marketing community. They are very much aware that
television is no longer the bedrock for brand communications. That’s why they
need to move aggressively to mitigate their structural issues and leverage the
spectacular opportunities they have before them – and do so with purpose and
passion. If they need a wake up call, they need look no further than the Pepsi
One re-launch – which has no television commercials in its marketing plan.
It’ll be interesting to see how the “drama” plays out.
Kind of like a soap opera – don’t you think?
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on March 24, 2005 in Advertising, Conferences, Marketing Accountability, Television | Permalink | Comments (7)
In Monday’s issue of MediaPost’s MediaDailyNews, Joe Mandese asked for my predictions for the upcoming year. Along with marketing colleagues such as Laura Desmond, CEO, MediaVest; Steve Farella, CEO Targetcast TCM and Betsy Frank, executive vice-president research and planning, Viacom’s cable networks; I had the opportunity to reflect on where the industry is headed in 2005. Here are some of my thoughts:
A recent Wall Street Journal article, “The Ad World's Message for 2005: Stealth” (unavailable online) made an interesting point about the challenges facing our industry:
If marketers learned one key point over the past year, it is that reaching consumers by traditional means -- TV, magazines and newspapers -- is getting harder. American spenders are moving targets. They are seeking information from a broader range of sources than ever and, in the process, filtering out messages that don't resonate or speak to their specific needs.
Along with the strong vision of ANA chairman, Jim Stengel, global marketing office for Procter & Gamble, we have already begun to work on key themes to focus on this year including: marketing accountability, harnessing the power of the marketing organization, and leveraging marketing technology.
As a sneak preview, here’s what the ANA has planned in 2005 to meet these marketplace needs. Look for the ANA to: strengthen communication between the CEO and CMO through informative and content driven conferences, continue with our corporate marketing training program including industry accreditation, develop new conferences like the Law and Business Affairs Conference to discuss topical industry issues and support technological advances like Ad-ID.
We know that the marketing environment is changing- it’s our job to move forward and stay ahead of the curve.
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on January 06, 2005 in Advertising, Marketing, Marketing Accountability | Permalink | Comments (1)
In a recent blog post I noted that accountability is the cornerstone of the ANA. It is our driving force, our core mission, our reason for being. And the table was certainly set for us earlier this month at the ANA Masters of Marketing Conference where presentation after presentation demonstrated that the underlying theme was most definitely “Accountability.”
The topic echoed throughout the conference from presenters Larry Light of McDonald’s to Mike Winkler of Hewlett Packard -- everyone in attendance was in agreement that marketers are under intense pressure to demonstrate real value for their investments. Marketers are ravenous to deploy new and relevant accountability tools and are voracious to grow their brand building knowledge.
Naturally, you might ask, where is the CMO in this effort to capture marketing accountability? It’s our question too. So, recently we dug deeper into the world of the marketing organization and the CMO by teaming up with management consulting firm, Booz Allen Hamilton. We set out to assess the role and priorities of marketing organizations in a focused study.
One major theme that emerged was that the role of the CMO is poorly defined at an alarming number of companies and that companies expect marketing to provide measurable outcomes like ROI, but current metrics are not up to the task. Nearly 75% of marketers and non-marketers agree that marketing is far more important to corporate success than it was five years ago. But marketing is increasingly disconnected from the CEO agenda with top line growth (52%) being the primary focus for CEOs and marketing efforts focused more on tactical issues such as setting and maintaining branding guidelines (83%).
The landscape of marketing is clearly changing and the Annual Conference elevated this conversation. With each step we take, as an industry, we are sharing our best practices, identifying our goals and shaping new and improved ways to accomplish optimal business models. Jim Stengel, Global Marketing Officer for Procter & Gamble, and the newly announced chairman of the ANA, opened the gates and told attendees that accountability and ROI can be exciting and sexy.
While there is no one silver bullet out there, the collective industry is beginning to move aggressively to increment the level of sophistication and marketing intellectual capital to drive productivity and re-engage our core customers as we build our brands. Marketers are taking increasing control as they are:
* Analyzing internal data
* Conducting original quantitative, qualitative and local research
* Reviewing the use and deployment of key metrics
* Providing more in-depth analyses of syndicated data
* Implementing marketing mix modeling
* Constructing financial models with marketing metrics
* Using brand valuation analyses
Is the CMO really necessary? Absolutely. Marketing accountability and the CMO model are observably linked. The success of each depends on that of the other and it’s essential that this emerging CMO reach out and grab hold of the opportunities within the industry that will ultimately help to drive the marketing accountability agenda.
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on October 26, 2004 in Marketing Accountability | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (1)
Marketing accountability is one of the most important subjects we have in front of us at the ANA – and for very good reasons. Too often, the marketing industry had been blistered by criticism of our inability to connect "the cause" with "the effect." Often, marketers had to struggle and guess at the results of well thought out marketing and advertising campaigns. Trying to understand the impact on brands was even harder to assess.
I am very pleased that the industry has taken the message to heart. Perhaps reacting to impatient CEO's, the industry has been hard at work to bring more measurements and common sense to this arena. Efforts have sprung up in most companies to enhance the level of marketing quantification and valuation. Some companies are well ahead of others – but, importantly, we feel that the movement is gaining important traction – traction that we will continue to fuel at our upcoming "Masters of Marketing" conference – ANA’s Annual Conference – on October 7-10.
We believe so much in this subject that we, at the ANA, will be raising the marketing accountability "bar" at every opportunity. We applaud the work of our comrades at the Radio Advertising Bureau, the Advertising Research Foundation, the Interactive Advertising Bureau and others for their efforts to help the industry raise that bar. For ANA’s part, marketing accountability is one of the leading subjects at our marketing and media committee meetings, it is reflected in our increased survey work with members, and it is the subject of a dedicated conference that the ANA kicked off this year – The Marketing Accountability Forum. At that meeting, Peter Sealey – the CEO of the Los Altos Group and the host for the meeting – brought increased attention to one of the most important innovations to enhance marketing accountability – Ad-ID.
For those unfamiliar with Ad-ID, the quick answer is that it represents the industry's "UPC Code" for digitally tagging and tracking every advertising and marketing asset a company may have – be it television, radio, internet, packaging or print. Created jointly by the 4A’s and the ANA, the rollout of Ad-ID is well underway – currently being used by more than 100 companies – a list that is growing very quickly. By providing a central coding system that is embraced and recognized by all in the media, agency and marketing communities, the opportunities for substantially enhancing productivity are endless. One such opportunity we are very excited about is the integration of Ad-ID with the upcoming rollout of electronic data interchange (EDI). Just think of the enormous productivity that will be generated by the media ordering and invoicing system. Just think about the end of incorrect advertising placements and screw-ups in the billing process. Just think of having the ability to verify what commercial truly ran. Just think about the opportunity to take your media asset and target it more directly to a particular audience segment or geography – and being able to measure its impact. Those dreams are becoming reality. Just recently, the major TV networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX) have become Ad-ID compliant – enhancing the industry’s ability to realize increasing productivity over time.
We really are making strides to guessing less and measuring more. We, as an industry, have a long way to go. But we are on the right track – and we are beginning to make considerable progress. The fun aspect is that we are not far off from making a real dent into understanding the answer to the age old John Wannamaker question "Which half of my advertising is wasted?"
Posted by Association of National Advertisers on August 25, 2004 in Marketing Accountability | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (3)