Research Renewal
Ah, yes, it is time to talk about one of the more forgotten aspects of the marketing accountability equation – research – and the quality of research.
Let’s put this subject in context and talk a little bit about marketing accountability. Whewww… this is something we’ve talked about so, so much …. and still have such a long way to go. That’s good!!!! Keep it coming.
In my mind, the primary objective of “marketing accountability” is to improve the productivity of the entire marketing supply chain to:
• Build brand equity
• Drive short term business results
• Enhance long term performance potential
• Streamline and increase the productivity of the marketing process
• Improve the marketing decision making process across all platforms
We can dig deeper for what all of these mean in greater detail – but we’ll save that for another time. Suffice it to say, that driving marketing accountability forward advances the “capability” of the entire marketing network. Decisions get made with greater precision, improving the odds of marketing success. Net, we get a greater return on our marketing investments. That’ll bring a few grins to the CEO and CFO – don’t you think?
The ANA has fielded three marketing accountability surveys and written two white papers based on the findings of the ANA Marketing Accountability Taskforce What we found is that to advance the marketing accountability continuum, organizations need to:
• Develop and nurture the core competencies of people – so they learn how to be “accountable”
• Manage data as an asset – and use data to create a common language throughout the company
• Create and leverage metrics for understanding and profitably growing brands and sales
• Proactively plan and deploy campaigns with well developed marketing management processes
• “Standardize behavior” by improving foundation enterprise tools for data aggregation, reporting and analysis